Unveiling How Internal Control Foster Sustainable Green Innovation Ecosystem: Mediating Role of Environment Management Accounting Data Analytics

Authors

  • Quang Huy Pham School of Accounting, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City (UEH), Vietnam
  • Kien Phuc Vu School of Accounting, University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City (UEH), Vinhlong Campus, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47747/fmiic.v1i1.2169

Abstract

This study constructs and validates a theoretical framework that focuses on the correlation between internal control systems (ICS) and the sustainable green innovation ecosystem (SGIE). Furthermore, it aims to investigate the role of environmental management accounting data analytics (EMADA) as a mediator in the relationship between ICS and SGIE. The current study utilized a methodological approach consisting of three components namely a literature review, expert interviews, and a self-administered survey. The study used structural equation modeling to analyze the proposed model, which was constructed using statistical data gathered from a cross-sectional survey of 583 accountants working in public sector organizations (PSOs). The acquired observations underscored the interdependence and mutual reinforcement of the proposed dimensions. These observations provided guidance for PSO leaders to recognize and take advantage of chances to enhance their effectiveness in the green innovation implementation journey. They also helped in developing strong strategies to efficiently steer their digital transformation process. The work's detailed findings were crucial in enabling policymakers to establish rules and regulations linked to digitalization and green innovation.

References

Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable Construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39-58. doi: 10.1177/0149206316678451.

Agyeiwaah, E. (2022). An Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods Design: A Research Design for Small Tourism Enterprises in Ghana. In: Okumus, F., Rasoolimanesh, S.M. and Jahani, S. (Ed.) Advanced Research Methods in Hospitality and Tourism, Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 25-45.

Almubaydeen, T.H., Shabayek, N.O.A.A., Al-Ramahi, N.M., alkabbji, R., Kanan, M. (2023). The Impact of the Characteristics of Accounting Information Systems on the Quality of Integrated Reports in the Industrial Companies Listed on the Amman Stock Exchange. In: Hannoon, A., Mahmood, A. (eds) Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things, and Society 5.0. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 1113 (pp. 533-544). Springer, Cham.

Alraja, M.N., Imran, R., Khashab, B.M., & Shah, M. (2022). Technological Innovation, Sustainable Green Practices and SMEs Sustainable Performance in Times of Crisis (COVID-19 pandemic). Information Systems Frontiers, 24, 1081–1105. doi: 10.1007/s10796-022-10250-z.

Asiaei, K., Bontis, N., Alizadeh, R., & Yaghoubi, M. (2021). Green intellectual capital and environmental management accounting: natural resource orchestration in favor of environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 76-93. doi: 10.1002/bse.2875.

Bresciani, S., Rehman, S.U., Giovando, G., & Alam, G.M. (2023). The role of environmental management accounting and environmental knowledge management practices influence on environmental performance: mediated-moderated model. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(4), 896-918. doi: 10.1108/JKM-12-2021-0953.

Bujang, M. A., Omar, E. D., & Baharum, N. A. (2018). A review on sample size determination for Cronbach’s alpha test: A simple guide for researchers. The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences: MJMS, 25(6), 85–99. doi: 10.21315/mjms2018.25.6.9.

Chang, H. C., & Deegan, C. (2010). Exploring factors influencing environmental management accounting adoption at RMIT University. In Sixth Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference (APIRA2010) (pp. 1–39). Sydney

Chowdhury, E.K. (2023). Integration of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Management Accounting Information System: An Empirical Study. In: Abedin, M.Z., Hajek, P. (eds) Novel Financial Applications of Machine Learning and Deep Learning. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 336 (pp.35-46). Springer, Cham.

Creswell, J., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage publications.

Cui, R., Wang, J., & Zhou, C. (2023). Exploring the linkages of green transformational leadership, organizational green learning, and radical green innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 185-199, doi: 10.1002/bse.3124.

de Camargo Fiorini, P., Roman Pais Seles, B. M., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Barberio Mariano, E., & de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L. (2018). Management theory and big data literature: From a review to a research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 112–129. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.005

De Vries, H., Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2018). A stakeholder perspective on public sector innovation: why position matters. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 84(2), 269–287. doi: 10.1177/0020852317715513.

Demirel, P., & Kesidou, E. (2018). Sustainability-oriented capabilities for eco-innovation: Meeting the regulatory, technology and market demands. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), 847–857. doi: 10.1002/bse.2286.

Donaldson, L. (2001). The Contingency Theory of Organizations. New York: Sage Publications, Inc.

Edler, J., & Yeow, J. (2016). Connecting demand and supply: The role of intermediation in public procurement of innovation. Research Policy, 45(2), 414–426. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.010.

Effendi, M. I., Sugandini, D., & Istanto, Y. (2020). Social Media Adoption in SMEs Impacted by COVID-19: The TOE Model*. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(11), 915–925. doi: 10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.915

El-Haddadeh, R. (2020). Digital innovation dynamics influence on organisational adoption: The case of cloud computing services. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(4), 985–999. doi: 10.1007/s10796-019-09912-2

Erauskin-Tolosa, A., Zubeltzu-Jaka, E., Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., & Boiral, O. (2020). ISO 14001, EMAS and environmental performance: a meta-analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1145-1159. doi: 10.1002/bse.2422.

Fan, X., Shan, X., Day, S., & Shou, Y. (2022). Toward green innovation ecosystems: past research on green innovation and future opportunities from an ecosystem perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 122(9), 2012-2044. doi: 10.1108/IMDS-12-2021-0798.

Farida, I., Mulyani, S., Akbar, B., & Setyaningsih, S.D. (2021). Implementation and Performance of Accounting Information Systems, Internal Control and Organizational Culture in the Quality of Financial Information. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, 26(1), 222-236.

Fernando, Y., & Wah, W. X. (2017). The impact of eco-innovation drivers on environmental performance: Empirical results from the green technology sector in Malaysia. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 12, 27–43. doi: 10.1016/J.SPC.2017.05.002.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104.

Gunarathne, N., & Lee, K.-H. (2021). The link between corporate energy management and environmental strategy implementation: Efficiency, sufficiency and consistency strategy perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293, 1-21. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126082.

Gunarathne, N., & Lee, K.-H. (2015). Environmental management accounting (EMA) for environmental management and organizational change. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 11(3), 362–383. doi: 10.1108/JAOC-10-2013-0078.

Gupta, A. K. (2021). Innovation dimensions and firm performance synergy in the emerging market: A perspective from Dynamic Capability Theory & Signaling Theory. Technology in Society, 64, 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101512.

Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.

Iroegbu, A. O. C., Sadiku, R. E., Ray, S. S., & Hamam, Y. (2020). Plastics in municipal drinking water and wastewater treatment plant effluents: challenges and opportunities for South Africa—a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 12953–12966. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08194-5.

Kock, N. (2015). Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. doi:10.4018/ijec.2015100101.

Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2012). Management Information Systems Managing in the Digital Firm (12th ed.). London: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Li, Y., & Shi, Y. (2022). Dynamic game analysis of enterprise green technology innovation ecosystem under double environmental regulation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 1-33. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711047.

Liao, Z. (2018). Institutional pressure, knowledge acquisition and a firm's environmental innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27, 849–857. doi: 10.1002/bse.2036.

Ma, X., Ock, Y.-S., Wu, F., & Zhang, Z. (2022). The Effect of Internal Control on Green Innovation: Corporate Environmental Investment as a Mediator. Sustainability, 14(3), 1-19. doi: 10.3390/su14031755.

Michelon, G., Bozzolan, S., & Beretta, S. (2015). Board monitoring and internal control system disclosure in different regulatory environments. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 16(1), 138-164. doi: 10.1108/JAAR-03-2012-0018.

Moore, J. F. (1993). Predator and prey: A new ecology of competition?. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75-83.

Mukwarami, S., & van der Poll, H.M. (2024). Critical environmental management accounting practices influencing service delivery of growing cities in a developing economy: a review and conceptual framework. Environment Systems and Decisions, 1-30. doi: 10.1007/s10669-023-09960-9.

Nkundabanyanga, S.K., Muramuzi, B., & Alinda, K. (2021). Environmental management accounting, board role performance, company characteristics and environmental performance disclosure. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 17(5), 633-659. doi: 10.1108/JAOC-03-2020-0035.

Nohria, N., & Khurana, R. (2010). Handbook of Leadership Theory and Practice. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Nyakuwanika, M., van der Poll, H.M., & van der Poll, J.A. (2021). A Conceptual Framework for Greener Goldmining through Environmental Management Accounting Practices (EMAPs): The Case of Zimbabwe. Sustainability, 13(18), 1-26. doi: 10.3390/su131810466.

Ojo, T. O., & Baiyegunhi, L. J. S. (2021). Climate change perception and its impact on net farm income of smallholder rice farmers in South-West, Nigeria. Journal of Cleaner Production, 310, 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127373.

Oliveira-Duarte, L., Aparecida Reis, D., Fleury, A. L., Aparecida Vasques, R., Fonseca Filho, H., Koria, M., & Baruque-Ramos, J. (2021). Innovation ecosystem framework directed to sustainable development goal #17 partnerships implementation. Sustainable Development, 29(5), 1018–1036. doi: 10.1002/sd.2191.

Otley, D. T. (1980). The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievements and prognosis. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 5(4), 413–428. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(80)90040-9.

Phan, T. N., Baird, K., & Su, S. (2017). The use and effectiveness of environmental management accounting. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 24(4), 355–374. doi: 10.1080/14486563.2017.1354235.

Qian, W., Hörisch, J., & Schaltegger, S. (2018). Environmental management accounting and its effects on carbon management and disclosure quality. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 1608–1619. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.092.

Rosa, F. S., Compagnucci, L., Lunkes, R. J., & Monteiro, J. J. (2023). Green innovation ecosystem and water performance in the food service industry: The effects of environmental management controls and digitalization. Business strategy and the environment, 32(8), 5459-5476. doi: 10.1002/bse.3430.

Sari, N., Ghozali, I., & Achmad, T. (2017). The effect of internal audit and internal control system on public accountability: The empirical study in Indonesia state universities. Technology, 8(9), 157-166.

Sauser, B. J., Reilly, R. R., & Shenhar, A. J. (2009). Why projects fail? How contingency theory can provide new insights – A comparative analysis of NASA’s Mars Climate Orbiter loss. International Journal of Project Management, 27(7), 665–679. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.01.004.

Schaeffer, M. S. (2014). Internal Controls in Accounts Payable. United State of America, US: Crystallus, Inc.

Schaltegger, S. (2018). Linking Environmental Management Accounting: A Reflection on (Missing) Links to Sustainability and Planetary Boundaries. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 38(1), 19–29. doi:10.1080/0969160x.2017.1395351

Sharma, P.N., Liengaard, B.D., Hair, J.F., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C.M. (2023). Predictive model assessment and selection in composite-based modeling using PLS-SEM: extensions and guidelines for using CVPAT. European Journal of Marketing, 57(6), 1662-1677. doi: 10.1108/EJM-08-2020-0636.

Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J.F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C.M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322-2347. doi: 10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189.

Somlai, R. (2022). Integrating decision support tools into businesses for sustainable development: A paradoxical approach to address the food waste challenge. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1607–1622. doi: 10.1002/bse.2972.

Tanbour, K.M., Nour, A.I. (2024). The Impact of Internal Auditing Activity on the Effectiveness of Digital Risk Management in Banks Registered on the Palestine Exchange. In: Khoury, R.E., Nasrallah, N. (eds) Intelligent Systems, Business, and Innovation Research. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 489 (pp.17-32). Springer, Cham.

Vasilev, V. L., Bakhvalov, S. I., Prikhod'ko, A. N., & Kazakov, A. V. (2017). Internal control in the system of innovation management in the modern business environment. International Journal of Economic Research, 14, 409-416.

Wang, K.-H., Umar, M., Akram, R., & Caglar, E. (2021). Is technological innovation making world “Greener”? An evidence from changing growth story of China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 165, 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120516.

Xiwena, L., Xub, D., and Shiyu, S. (2021). Research on the Internal Control Problems Faced by the Financial Sharing Center in the Digital Economy Era1—An example of Financial Sharing Center of H Co. Ltd. International Conference on Identification, Information and Knowledge in the internet of thing 2020. Procedia Computer Science, 187, 158–163. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.04.047.

Yi, H., & Zhang, Q. (2022). Knowledge-sharing strategies of university-industry alliances promoting green technology innovation in ecosystems: Based on the utility of multichannel funding. IEEE Access, 10, 65728–65743. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3184422.

Yu, X., Qi, Y., Yu, L., & He, Y. (2022). Temporal and spatial evolution of coupling coordination degree of industrial innovation ecosystem—From the perspective of green transformation. Sustainability, 14(7), 1-18. doi: 10.3390/su14074111.

Zeng, J., Chen, X., Liu, Y., Cui, R., & Zhao, P. (2022). How does the enterprise green innovation ecosystem collaborative evolve? Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 375, 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134181.

Zhou, Z., Zhao, W., Chen, X., & Zeng, H. (2017). MFCA extension from a circular economy perspective: Model modifications and case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, 110–125. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.049.

Zybery, I., & Rova, L. (2014). The role of the accountants in the framework of the modern technological developments and digital accounting systems. European Scientific Journal, 24, 30-48. doi: 10.19044/esj.2011.v24n0p%25p.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-31