The Role of Forum Discussion in the Online Learning Modality of Senior High School Students

Authors

  • Renato Tiria Department of Education
  • Mary Ann Ferrer Department of Education
  • Lilibeth Caballero
  • Jenny Verzosa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47747/ijets.v2i1.658

Keywords:

recitation, participation, forum discussion, synchronous, MELC

Abstract

The new normal has brought changes in the teaching-learning platform. Different modalities are implemented to ensure the continuation of education, but some nations had decided to close their educational system while amidst the pandemic. The Philippines have decided to enter the synchronous and asynchronous modality of learning. This study aimed to know the role of online recitation through forum discussion in the synchronous learning modality. Thirty grade 11 STEM students were chosen purposively for this study. Google Classroom was the online platform used by the researchers, the classwork section of the google classroom was utilized where questions were posted, and responses were placed by the students.  Rubric scoring was used to grade the works of students. The result of the study showed that there is no significant difference in the performance of students in terms of participation, quality of posts, plagiarism, and students' attitudes.

 

References

Aacharya, R. P. (2020, July). (PDF) “New Normal” in medical education. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343263212_%27New_Normal%27_in_Medical_Education

Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 18(2), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/249763

Alstete, J. W., & Beutell, N. J. (2004). Performance indicators in online distance learning courses: A study of management education. Quality Assurance in Education, 12(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880410517397

Althaus, S. L., & Althaus, S. L. (1997). Computer-mediated communication in the university classroom: An experiment. Communication Education, 46(3), 158–174.

Alzahrani, M. G. (2017). Student satisfaction with using online discussion forums at Saudi universities. World Journal of Education, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v7n2p1

Anderson, T., & Christiansen, J-A. (n.d.). Online conferences for professional development.

Andujar, A. (2019). Exploring new ways of eTandem and Telecollaboration through the WebRTC protocol: Students’ engagement and perceptions mobile instant messaging and language learning view project telecollaboration through Web RTC View project Cristóbal Medina-López Universidad de Almería. Article in International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i05.9612

Beuchot, A., & Bullen, M. (2007). Interaction and interpersonality in online discussion forums. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/01587910500081285, 26(1), 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 01587910500081285

Blackburn-Dwyer, B. (2016). 8 High-tech gadgets that are making classrooms smarter. https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/8-high-tech-gadgets-that-are-making-classrooms-sma/

Brower, H. H. (2017). On emulating classroom discussion in a distance-delivered OBHR course: Creating an on-line learning community. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2003.9324013

Bryant, B. K. (2005). Electronic discussion sections: A useful tool in teaching large university classes. Teaching of Psychology, 32(4), 271–275. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328023TOP3204_9

Camus, M., Hurt, N. E., Larson, L. R., & Prevost, L. (2016). Facebook as an online teaching tool: Effects on student participation, learning, and overall course performance. College Teaching, 64(2), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2015.1099093

Davidson-Shivers, G. V, Davidson-Shivers, G. V, Morris, S., & Sriwongkol, T. (2001). Gender and online discussions: Similarities or differences? EdMedia + Innovate Learning, 2001(1), 361–366.

de Lima, D. P. R., Gerosa, M. A., Conte, T. U., & de M. Netto, J. F. (2019). What to expect, and how to improve online discussion forums: The instructors’ perspective. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13174-019-0120-0

Dennen, V. P. (2007). From message posting to learning dialogues: Factors affecting learner participation in asynchronous discussion. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081376

Drohan, D., Deleastar, E., & Seeling, P. (2020). Online Education and the “New Normal.” SIGITE 2020 - Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Information Technology Education, 301. https://doi.org/10.1145/3368308.3415433

Duncan, K., Kenworthy, A., & McNamara, R. (2012). The Effect of synchronous and asynchronous participation on students’ performance in online accounting courses. Accounting Education, 21(4), 431–449. ttps://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2012.673387

Durrington, V. A., & Yu, C. (2004). ERIC - EJ874952 - It’s the same only different: The effect the discussion moderator has on student participation in online class discussions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ874952

Endorf, R. J., Koenig, K. M., & Braun, G. A. (2006). A preliminary study of the effectiveness of different recitation teaching methods. AIP Conference Proceedings, 818, 89–92. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2177030

Gupta, P. (2016, January). 5 Effective teaching methods and strategies - EdTechReviewTM (ETR). https://edtechreview.in/trends-insights/insights/2271-effective-teaching-strategies

Hew, Cheung, & Ng. (2010). Sci-Hub | Student contribution in asynchronous online discussion: A review of the research and empirical exploration | 10.2307/23372901. Springer. https://sci-hub.ee/10.2307/23372901

Ullah, O., Khan, W., & Khan, A. (2017). Students’ attitude towards online learning at tertiary level. PUTAJ-Humanities and Social Sciences, 25(2), 63-72.

Ma, H., Lu, E. Y., Turner, S., & Wan, G. (2007, September). ERIC - EJ780517 - An empirical investigation of digital cheating and plagiarism among middle school students, American Secondary Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ780517

Masters, K., & Oberprieler, G. (2004). Encouraging equitable online participation through curriculum articulation. Computers and Education, 42(4), 319–332. https:// doi.org/10.1016/ j.compedu.2003.09.001

Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. (2003). Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 40, 237–253. www.elsevier.com/locate/compedu

Modern Consumers. (2021). https://modernconsumers.com/types-classroom-technologies/

Molinari, L., & Mameli, C. (2013). Process quality of classroom discourse: Pupil participation and learning opportunities. International Journal of Educational Research, 62, 249–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.05.003

Murphy, C. A., & Fortner, R. A. (2014). Impact of instructor intervention on the quality and frequency of student discussion posts in a blended classroom. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(3).

Ozaydın Ozkara, B., & Cakir, H. (2018). Participation in online courses from the students’ perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(7), 924–942. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/10494820.2017.1421562

Palmer, S., Holt, D., & Bray, S. (2008). Does the discussion help? The impact of a formally assessed online discussion on final student results. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 847–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1467-8535.2007.00780.X

Papastergiou, M., Antoniou, P., & Apostolou, M. (2011). Effects of student participation in an online learning community on environmental education: A Greek case study. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(2), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2011.588416

Poole, D. M. (2000). Student participation in a discussion-oriented online course: A case study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2000.10782307

Recitations and Labs: Suggestions for Teaching Assistants | Graduate Studies | Nebraska. (n.d.). Retrieved April 24, 2021, from https://www.unl.edu/gradstudies/current/teaching/recitation

So, H. J. (2009). When groups decide to use asynchronous online discussions: Collaborative learning and social presence under a voluntary participation structure. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00293.x

Staveley-O’Carroll, J. (2015). The impact of classroom demonstrations and online discussions on student achievement. International Review of Economics Education, 20, 46–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2015.10.003

Thompson, E. W., & Savenye, W. C. (2007). Adult learner participation in an online degree program: A program‐level study of voluntary computer‐mediated communication. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/01587910701611336, 28(3), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 01587910701611336

Tiria, R. A., & Caballes, D. G. (2020, March). Implementation of education 4.0 in the senior high school in the Sixth District of Manila. CiiT International Journal of Automation and Autonomous System. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351075006_Implementation_of_ Education_40 _in_the_Senior_High_School_in_the_Sixth_District_of_Manila

Umar, I. N., & Aziz, Z. A. (2015). The effects of multimedia with different modes of presentation on recitation skills among students with different self-regulated learning level. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1962–1968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.584

Vonderwell, S., & Zachariah, S. (2005). Factors that influence participation in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/15391523.2005.10782457

Wang, A. Y., & Newlin, M. H. (2000). Characteristics of students who enroll and succeed in psychology web-based classes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.137

Watt, J. X., Feldhaus, C. R., Sorge, B. H., Fore, G. A., Gavrin, A. D., & Marrs, K. A. (2014). The effects of implementing recitation activities on success rates in a college calculus course 1. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/ 10.14434/ josotl.v14i4.12823

Wibowo, D. C., Friana, F., & Pelipa, E. D. (2018). Effect of recitation method to the students’ interest and learning results. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 1(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.1.1.2018.22

Wise, A. F., Speer, J., Marbouti, F., & Hsiao, Y. T. (2013). Broadening the notion of participation in online discussions: Examining patterns in learners’ online listening behaviors. Instructional Science, 41(2), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11251-012-9230-9

Yilmaz, O., & Tuzun, H. (2001). (PDF) Web-Based Instruction: Instructor and Student Problems. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234588000_Web-Based_Instruction_Instructor_and_ Student_Problems

Yukselturk, E. (2010). An investigation of factors affecting student participation level in an online discussion forum. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2).

Downloads

Published

2022-03-24

How to Cite

Tiria, R., Ferrer, M. A., Caballero, L. ., & Verzosa, J. (2022). The Role of Forum Discussion in the Online Learning Modality of Senior High School Students. International Journal of Education, Teaching, and Social Sciences, 2(1), 56-67. https://doi.org/10.47747/ijets.v2i1.658