Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Asset Intensity, Employee Intensity, Free Cash Flow, Leverage dan Size terhadap Cost Stickiness dengan Tobin’s Q sebagai Variabel Kontrol: Studi Kasus Perusahaan Manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2016-2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47747/snfmi.v1i.1514Keywords:
FinanceAbstract
This research examined the effect of profitability, asset intensity, employee intensity, free cash flow, leverage, and size on cost stickiness with tobin’s q as control variable. Cost stickiness was measured using the changes in selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) cost. The research used secondary data and the population of this research was 380 manufacturing companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange in the 2016-2020 period. The method used by purposive sampling with 102 manufacturing firms were obtained as the sample of this research. The analytical method used multiple linear regression analysis. The results showed that profitability and size have a positive and significant effect on cost stickiness, asset intensity, free cash flow, and leverage have a negative and significant effect on cost stickiness, and employee intensity has a positive and insignificant effect on cost stickiness.
References
Abu-Serdaneh, J. (2014). The Asymmetrical Behavior of Cost: Evidence from Jordan. International Business Research, 7(8), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v7n8p113
Affifah, A., Murdayanti, Y., & Purwohedi, U. (2018). Fenomena perilaku sticky cost pada perusahaan manufaktur di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi, 18(1A), 141–152.
Allolinggi, T. R., Saraswati, E., & Ghofar, A. (2021). Effect of corporate governance and earnings management on expense stickiness. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 8(3), 246–255. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v8n3.1593
Anderson, M. C., & Banker, R. D. (2000). Are Selling , General , and Administrative Costs “ Sticky ”? Are Selling , General , and Administrative Costs “ Sticky ”? 41(972), 47–63.
Balakrishnan, R., Petersen, M. J., & Soderstrom, N. S. (2004). Does Capacity Utilization Affect the. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 19(2002), 283–300.
Banker, R. D., Byzalov, D., & Chen, L. T. (2013). Employment protection legislation, adjustment costs and cross-country differences in cost behavior. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2012.08.003
Banker, R., & Dmitri, B. (2014). Asymmetric Cost Behavior Rajiv D. Banker Dmitri Byzalov. Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 26, No. 2, 43-79, 2014, 26.
Bradley, S. W., Shepherd, D. A., & Wiklund, J. (2011). The importance of slack for new organizations facing “tough” environments. Journal of Management Studies, 48(5), 1071–1097. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00906.x
Calleja, K., Steliaros, M., & Thomas, D. C. (2006). A note on cost stickiness: Some international comparisons. Management Accounting Research, 17(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2006.02.001
Chen, C. X., Lu, H., & Sougiannis, T. (2012). The Agency Problem, Corporate Governance, and the Asymmetrical Behavior of Selling, General, and Administrative Costs. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 252–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01094.x
Evelyn, E. (2019). Pengaruh Perubahan Penjualan, Asset Intensity, Profitability, Size, Dan Leverage Terhadap Cost Stickiness. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 2(2), 411. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmieb.v2i2.1609
Hussien, L., Hani, A., & Zraqat, O. M. (2021). Explanatory Factors for Asymmetric Cost Behaviour: Evidence from Jordan. 15(4), 201–219. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350132303
Jazuli. (2018). UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA Poliklinik UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA. Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah & Kota, 1(3), 82–91.
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Corporate Bankruptcy, 76(2), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511609435.005
Josep Ma Argilés-Bosch, Josep García-Blandón, Diego Ravenda, Maika M. Valencia-Silva, A. D. S. (2017). The influence of the trade-off between profitability and future increases in sales on cost stickiness. Estudios de Economía, 44(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v14n5p19
Kama, I., & Weiss, D. (2013). Do Earnings Targets and Managerial Incentives Affect Sticky Costs? Journal of Accounting Research, 51(1), 201–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00471.x
Kaspereit, T., Lopatta, K., & Onnen, D. (2017). Shareholder Value Implications of Compliance with the German Corporate Governance Code. Managerial and Decision Economics, 38(2), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2750
Lee, J. H. (2018). Empirical Analysis of Asymmetric Cost Behavior. University of Calgary, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.11575/PRISM/31827
Li, T., & Lu, C. (2022). Stakeholder orientation and cost stickiness: Evidence from a natural experiment. Finance Research Letters, 47(November), 102618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102618
Lopatta, K., Kaspereit, T., & Gastone, L. M. (2020). Managerial style in cost asymmetry and shareholder value. Managerial and Decision Economics, 41(5), 800–826. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3139
Mo, K., Park, K. J., & Kim, Y. J. (2018). CEO pension and selling, general and administrative cost stickiness. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 22(4).
Noreen, E. (1991). Conditions Under Which Activity-Based Cost Systems Provide Relevant Costs. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 3((fall)), 159–168.
Pichetkun, N., & Panmanee, P. (2012). The Determinants of Sticky Cost Behavior: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Journal of Accounting Profession, 8(23), 29–61.
Sidabutar, D., Khairunnisa, & Akmal. (2018). Pengaruh Size, Free Cash Flow, Discretionary Expense Ratio, Roa, Tobins Q, Leverage Ratio, Terhadap Sticky Cost Behavior Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2013-2015. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan & Perpajakan Indonesia (JAKPI), 6(1), 13–26.
Sobhy, N., Megeid, A., & Samy El-Deeb, M. (2021). Board Characteristics Effect on Cost Stickiness Using Earnings Management as a Mediating Variable “Evidence from Egypt” Associate Professor of Accounting College of Management and Technology Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport. Alexandria Journal of Accounting Research Second Issue, 5.
Soenjoto, E., & andri, A. (2018). The Asymmetrical Cost Behavior: Cost Stickiness in Indonesian Listed Manufacturing Companies. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3299184
Wahyuningtyas, Y., & Nugrahanti, Y. W. (2014). Pengaruh Asset Intensity dan Employee Intensity terhadap Sticky Cost pada Biaya Penjualan, Administrasi dan Umum Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di BEI. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 8(2), 113–121.
Weiss, D., & Weiss, D. (2011). DO MANAGERS ’ DELIBERATE DECISIONS INDUCE STICKY COSTS ? by This paper was partially financed by the Henry Crown Institute of Business Research Do managers ’ deliberate decisions induce sticky costs ?
Wijayanti, I. (2021). Sticky Cost Behavior in Agricultural Sector Companies in Indonesia. Journal of Economics, Finance And Management Studies, 05(01), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v5-i1-16
Windyastuti. (2013). Penetapn target terhadap Stickiness Cost. 17(1), 71–77.
Wira Ramashar, Anriva, D. H., Azmi, Z., & Binagkit, I. D. (2019). THE EFFECT OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL AND COMPANY SIZE ON STICKY COST (Empirical Study of Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Ekonomi, 9(2), 233–242.
Xue, S., & Hong, Y. (2016). Earnings management, corporate governance and expense stickiness. China Journal of Accounting Research, 9(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2015.02.001
Yunaz, F., & Sasongko, C. (2017). Analysis of behavior and determinants of cost stickiness in manufacturing companies in Indonesia. Competition and Cooperation in Economics and Business, 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315225227-2
Zhang, Y., & Keusch, T. (n.d.). The Stickiness of SG & A Costs , Agency Problems and Competition Intensity Author : Student number : Thesis supervisor :
Zulfiati, L., Gusliana, R., & Nuridah, S. (2020). Cost Stickiness: Behavior and Factors. 127(Aicar 2019), 143–145. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200309.032
