Blurring Boundaries and Work-Life Integration: A Theoretical and Empirical Review of Their Effects on Productivity, Life Satisfaction, and Organizational Commitment
Blurring Boundaries and Work-Life Integration: A Theoretical and Empirical Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47747/jbme.v7i2.3337Keywords:
Blurring Boundaries, Work-Life Integration, Productivity, Life Satisfaction, Organizational CommitmentAbstract
Blurring boundaries between work and personal life have become a defining feature of contemporary work systems, intensifying through digital connectivity, flexible working arrangements, and the expansion of remote and hybrid work structures. This review synthesizes theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence to examine how blurring boundaries conceptualized as work-life integration shape employee productivity, life satisfaction, and organizational commitment. Drawing on boundary theory, role integration frameworks, and modern research on digital labor, the findings demonstrate that work-life integration can enhance productivity by increasing autonomy, flexibility, and reducing transition costs. However, boundary permeability may also induce technostress, work intrusion and role overload, undermining wellbeing and performance. Life satifaction improves when integration is voluntary and aligned with personal preferences but decreases when constant connectivity disrupts recovery time or intensifies conflict between roles. Organizational commitment strengthens when integration practices are perceived as supportive and empowering but weakens when blurring boundaries are associated with surveillance or exploitation. This review clarifies conceptual ambiguities, identifies moderating conditions underlying positive and negative effect, and provides directions for future research on adaptive boundary management in digital driven work environments.
References
Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). Telecommuting and employee outcomes. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1311–1334.
Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 472–491.
Chen, A., & Karahanna, E. (2018). Life interrupted: The effects of technology-mediated work interruptions on work and nonwork outcomes. MIS Quarterly, 42(4), 1023–1042.
Chien, S. et al. (2022). Online boundary blurring and its impact on interpersonal and workplace outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior.
Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory. Human Relations, 53(6), 747–770.
Dibia, C., & Ganguli-Mitra, A. (2026). Racialised surveillance and the control of community treatment orders. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 93, 101960.
Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory. Human Relations, 53(6), 747–770.
Dibia, C., & Ganguli-Mitra, A. (2026). Racialised surveillance and the control of community treatment orders. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 93, 101960.
Galati, A. J., et al. (2023). Exposome–metabolome interactions and blurred disciplinary boundaries. Journal of Exposomics.
Harris, R. et al. (2024). Work–home boundary negotiation under remote work conditions. Social Science & Medicine.
Kossek, E. E., & Lautsch, B. (2012). Work–family boundary management styles. Organizational Psychology Review, 2(2), 152–171.
Klindžić, M., & Marić, M. (2019). Work–life balance and organizational outcomes. Employee Relations.
Molino, M., et al. (2020). Technostress and digital overload in modern work. Computers in Human Behavior.
Reed-Berendt, R., & Clough, B. (2024). (Un)Blurred lines? Sex, disability, and the dynamic boundaries of mental capacity law. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 93, 101960.
Szalavetz, A. (2022). Digitalization and professional autonomy in care work. Technology in Society.
Thibault, C., et al. (2025). Boundary issues in renovation engineering. Energy and Buildings.
Vaziri, H., et al. (2020). Pandemic-driven work–life integration. Journal of Applied Psychology.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Asa Sheila Amelia, Fauzi Ichwani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)




